Right Happy Ending, you've hooked me, I'll play!

So right now going to re-watch Ruth and the car scene and HArry in the house scene. Not sure what I missed during my previous 4 watches but never need much of an excuse to watch an ep of Spooks. Just to amuse myself about what you are getting at

(20-10-2011 07:40 AM)Sparky Wrote:  Just a couple of quick thoughts after a re-watch which others may have already mentioned.

When Harry and Ruth are having the conversation after she's stolen the lap-top from the Embassy; him saying to her to pop round to his house and she'll be able to 'read everything', seems to me to demonstrate that he has the utmost trust in her. I saw it as him saying to her, that whatever was on the lap-top was highly secret and probably contained a lot of his past 'secrets', (hence why he didn't want her to take it to the Grid) but that he was fine with her, and her alone, seeing whatever was on there. On a different note, in the filming of that scene Harry seemed to do a lot of his talking without the camera being on his mouth (lots of eyes in the mirror from behind etc) and I wonder if they changed that dialogue (as they often do) after filming had finished?

Interesting take on it; he was at the stage of not knowing who to trust, even himself, but he still trusted Ruth. He knew that he was having questions about his loyalties, but for him, Ruth has been his moral compass. Even if he knew she was having doubts about where she stood with him, he trusted her with his life.

Quote:My other little comment may be nothing at all and just a continuity error, but I know I'm not alone in this observation. When Harry opens the door to Ilya at his house there are no coats hanging, yet when he leaves the next day after disposing of his milk and wearing his overcoat there is a black coat hanging there. Next scene is the Thames 'beach' scene where Ruth after wearing a black coat all series (in fact nothing but black and blue clothing full stop) has on a much lighter grey coat! This could be nothing at all and I (and others) are reading to much into it, or did Ruth pop round for a 'cup of tea' after all?

I'd have to check, but I have the feeling that it was an MI-5 asset house, not Harry's house in particular. I have severe doubts that Harry would have invited Ilya into his OWN house. Too much of a security risk.

(20-10-2011 12:48 PM)Endinghappy Wrote:  Let's just say someone or some people somewhere around the grid think very highly of the support extended too them and don't wish anyone to be worked up (other than in a good way) about the final hour. However please bear in mind the grid is a big place.

Endinghappy - many thanks for your input! I feel a little better about the last episode now Do you mean by your comment that the people 'somewhere around the grid' read this forum and our mad ravings? :-) If so, that is nice to know, and I whilst I wouldn't presume to speak on behalf on everyone, I'm sure I can't be alone in saying that I hope everyone involved with the show knows how much their hard work, and mastery of their craft - the acting, writing and directing, behind the scenes etc has been appreciated for the last ten years. All of you have created something very special and characters and stories that have really touched people, and that is why the fans care so much about what happens to them! I know I will feel very emotional on sunday no matter what happens as I will miss Spooks so much! But, alas, as I know, 'all good things..' and all that.Please do come back on Monday and post! In the meantime, I am off to re-watch the scene you mentioned in the car. Hm.....

(20-10-2011 05:59 AM)Silktie Wrote:  

(19-10-2011 02:22 PM)A Cousin Wrote:  In another completely unrelated thought, did anyone think that Coaver calling Harry "Hal" a direct reference to Prince Hal/Henry V? Not sure about it historically, but Shakespeare's Prince Hal was a loose cannon as a young man but the king he grew into was one of the most heroic. More notably, in the play, Henry V grapples with the moral burden of being King.

Ooh, nice idea! Methinks there are just too many of these symbolisms for it all to be a fluky coincidence. The writers must have planned it.

Re that painting, I am in agreement with those who see it as speaking to Elena's character rather than Ruth's.

Something else that amused me: Ilya has a 'tortoise in the garden', and what does Harry have in his? A box full of secrets. Great stuff.

hmm so will we see a scene in the theater in southwarkk.

I would take any comments regarding the ending with a pinch of salt, whoever they seem to come from. What could be a great end for some would be terrible for others, everyone has a different outlook on what they want! There are so many rumours flying around, and I feel no-one will really know until 9.59pm on Sunday!

Back to the actual discussion on 10.5. As I've said before, great episode and its certainly fun trying to look into the hidden symbolism of some of the scenes. Some I'm sure are intended and others not!

This thread is for discussion of Episode 5 only. Any speculation about Episode 6 should be in the Rumors and Speculation thread.

I also suggest you ALL read our spoiler policy here: http://www.spooksforum.co.uk/announcement-1.html

If people continue to discuss rumors and speculation in this thread, I will start warning people. I have removed all the posts from the last couple of pages which were not discussing the episode.

I would also suggest you stop worrying about people who may or may not be part of the production team of Spooks, this is the internet.

(21-10-2011 08:02 AM)Nitrus Wrote:  This thread is for discussion of Episode 5 only. Any speculation about Episode 6 should be in the Rumors and Speculation thread.

I also suggest you ALL read our spoiler policy here: http://www.spooksforum.co.uk/announcement-1.html

If people continue to discuss rumors and speculation in this thread, I will start warning people. I have removed all the posts from the last couple of pages which were not discussing the episode.

I would also suggest you stop worrying about people who may or may not be part of the production team of Spooks, this is the internet.

Fair enough but I can understand why some people are posting here. It is most frustrating in the last few weeks that posts are not appearing in the Rumours and Speculation thread sometimes for many days and I think too, many aren't even bothering to post there because of this.

Posts are appearing fine in the Rumours thread: http://www.spooksforum.co.uk/thread-1402...l#pid49878

(21-10-2011 10:40 AM)nothingisasitseems Wrote:  

(21-10-2011 08:02 AM)Nitrus Wrote:  This thread is for discussion of Episode 5 only. Any speculation about Episode 6 should be in the Rumors and Speculation thread.

I also suggest you ALL read our spoiler policy here: http://www.spooksforum.co.uk/announcement-1.html

If people continue to discuss rumors and speculation in this thread, I will start warning people. I have removed all the posts from the last couple of pages which were not discussing the episode.

I would also suggest you stop worrying about people who may or may not be part of the production team of Spooks, this is the internet.

Fair enough but I can understand why some people are posting here. It is most frustrating in the last few weeks that posts are not appearing in the Rumours and Speculation thread sometimes for many days and I think too, many aren't even bothering to post there because of this.

I completely agree with you. I found the way to be able to read the newest posts, but it's frustrating. You go to the end of the last page mentioned in the thread Rumours and Speculation and click on new reply. You do not write in the new reply, just scroll down until you will see the more recent posts. Once you read the new entries, just press the back arrow on top of the page to get back to the old posts. I hope my explanation is clear. I am not very good at instructions.