+- Spooks Forum (http://www.spooksforum.co.uk)
+-- Forum: MI5 Operations (/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: Series 9 (/forum-29.html)
+--- Thread: Series 9 Rumours & Speculation (/thread-861.html)
Series 9 Rumours & Speculation - Nitrus - 07-05-2010 01:55 PM
This thread is for all the rumours and speculation that DOESN'T fit into either of the following threads:
Filming & Behind the Scenes Discussion
Storylines Discussion
Here is a list of the links from the previous thread "Series 9 rumours...". We're putting them here to save you trawling back through the old thread:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00p85vd -> Series 9 commissioned (evenstar1955)
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/tv_and_radio/article6971738.ece -> Article on the Times that mentions "Spooks will return in autumn". (Tea Lady)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/jan/13/bbc-drama-ben-stephenson (evenstar1955)
http://www.atvnewsnetwork.co.uk/today/index.php/atv-today/2107-special-report-bbc-drama-where-could-the-axe-fall -> Spooks commisioned for 9th series, last one? spooks film? (Tygerbright)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1244501/Spooks-Waking-The-Dead-face-wrath-BBC-budget-cuts.html -> Spooks facing the axe (YourFutureMuse)
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/news/a197791/bbc-denies-spooks-dead-axe.html -> BBC denies 'Spooks', 'Dead' axe (SPOOK91)
http://www.spooksforum.co.uk/thread-432-post-15026.html#pid15026 -> Tea Lady posts her reply from kudos
http://www.spooksforum.co.uk/thread-432-post-15357.html#pid15357 and http://www.spooksforum.co.uk/thread-432-post-15363.html#pid15363 -> Scarlet says there will be a series 10 (I put this here as it's a rumours thread...)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/feb/15/stephen-garrett-kudos -> Interview with Stephen Garrett, funder and head of Kudos. (Aria)
http://www.spooksforum.co.uk/thread-432-post-16985.html#pid16985 -> Post by nadiatw about Max Brown joining Spooks, the thing is that the twitter link no loger exists...
http://www.tvchoicemagazine.co.uk/choicechat/speaking-spooks -> Talks about new actors: Sophia Myles, Max Brown and about some f the old ones. (Lucas North#1)
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/interviews/a218080/richard-armitage-strike-back.html -> RA interview about Strike Back mentioning Spooks. (TygerBright)
http://twitter.com/victor19724/status/9495993757 -> Victor Zaragoza in an episode.
http://www.sainou.com/actor.php?actor=18 -> Daniel Adegboyega participating is Spooks (Simone)
Please continue discussion from the previous thread here.. thanks!
RE: Rumours & Speculation Discussion - Tea Lady - 07-05-2010 04:01 PM
*hoping got right thread here*
Going back to the brief GMTV interview with PF yesterday (which I know some of you haven't seen) something has been bothering me about what was said. PF says something like, the surprise in S9 is the second last person you would expect it to be, who are not what they seem.
PF actually said "last person" first and then corrected himself to "second last person."
Now I know there have been lots of comments by RA in the last few days, but for me, he would be the obvious choice for someone not to be as they seem. For me the last person is Harry, and the second last person would be Ruth.....
One to ponder.
RE: Rumours & Speculation Discussion - Nitrus - 07-05-2010 04:04 PM
I would say that Ruth would be the last person to expect to be the betrayer, with Harry being second-last. Just because Harry is more of a spy whereas Ruth is more of a clerical worker, if that makes sense.
RE: Rumours & Speculation Discussion - SPOOK91 - 07-05-2010 04:41 PM
Hmm that is interesting, hasn't RA been saying though that Lucas is "not what he thought he was" so couldn't that be what PF is getting at?
RE: Rumours & Speculation Discussion - Aria - 07-05-2010 04:47 PM
(07-05-2010 04:01 PM)Tea Lady Wrote: Now I know there have been lots of comments by RA in the last few days, but for me, he would be the obvious choice for someone not to be as they seem. For me the last person is Harry, and the second last person would be Ruth.....
One to ponder.
My "ultimate betrayal" theory about Ruth is gaining credence
RE: Rumours & Speculation Discussion - SPOOK91 - 07-05-2010 04:50 PM
Well if she was the betrayer it would also explain how when she began to get close with Harry in s5 she backed off, guilt perhaps?
RE: Rumours & Speculation Discussion - picard1109 - 07-05-2010 05:56 PM
(07-05-2010 04:01 PM)Tea Lady Wrote: *hoping got right thread here*
Going back to the brief GMTV interview with PF yesterday (which I know some of you haven't seen) something has been bothering me about what was said. PF says something like, the surprise in S9 is the second last person you would expect it to be, who are not what they seem.
PF actually said "last person" first and then corrected himself to "second last person."
Now I know there have been lots of comments by RA in the last few days, but for me, he would be the obvious choice for someone not to be as they seem. For me the last person is Harry, and the second last person would be Ruth.....
One to ponder.
Exactly!!
RE: Rumours & Speculation Discussion - Tea Lady - 07-05-2010 06:40 PM
(07-05-2010 04:41 PM)SPOOK91 Wrote: Hmm that is interesting, hasn't RA been saying though that Lucas is "not what he thought he was" so couldn't that be what PF is getting at?
S9 is also supposed to be about genetics so perhaps Lucas has something to do with that storyline rather than the betrayal story. A bit like that BBC series "First Born."
I hoped you guys (apart from Nitrus) would say that you didn't think it was Ruth and I was wrong in my thinking...Now I'm getting worried !!
I do though see your point Nitrus, in that Ruth has always worked at a desk. Where and when would she have been turned? Also why run away from Harry if you are supposed to be a betrayer? Shouldn't you have stayed and let Harry go down for the torture claims in 5.5?
RE: Rumours & Speculation Discussion - Beatriz - 07-05-2010 06:47 PM
I really hope they don't go that way
hehe Maybe they are trying to cofuse us... But if we take what PF said in that interview for granted, it would be Harry or Ruth 
Thanks for that sneak peak, TL. what else did he say? I've been trying to find the interview, but failed
RE: Rumours & Speculation Discussion - Tea Lady - 07-05-2010 07:00 PM
(07-05-2010 06:47 PM)Beatriz Wrote: Thanks for that sneak peak, TL. what else did he say? I've been trying to find the interview, but failed
That was it really. Oh PF did say he didnt know who the person was though, as it hadn't yet been written which seemed a bit of an odd thing to say as he must have known who he meant when he said "second-last person." It may be though that Kudos just told him what to say in that interview, and he didn't really know who the person was. A bit confusing anyway. The clip really was only 90 seconds or so. The rest of the interview will be released by GMTV nearer the time.