Thread Rating:
  • 1 Votes - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
SpooksWatch 2010
03-03-2010, 04:17 PM
Post: #31
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
(03-03-2010 03:43 PM)JHyde Wrote:  twitter updates should not be posted here without there being pictures to go with them. This is why the Foxhills one was OK. There was a link to a facebook page and it will be verifiable. The others are just people saying 'oh hey, spooks is getting filmed near me'.

Only post if you have pics please! The historian in me wants proof. Or something reasonably close, anyway.

Maybe you`re right. Sometimes it´s only a feeling if the posts are true. I try to proof the next ones, if there are any!! For those living in London Twitter might be a good resource to find the set and do take some photos!!!!
Find all posts by this user
03-03-2010, 04:18 PM (This post was last modified: 03-03-2010 04:27 PM by JHyde.)
Post: #32
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
We're in a season 9 thread and at this point it's all speculation anyway. If you publish anything that smacks of a storyline or characters' intentions, please whack it in spoiler tags.

We won't be adding anything to the locations thread for season 9 yet, obviously because we haven't seen season 9.

IF YOU ARE UNCERTAIN, PLEASE CHECK WITH A MOD FIRST.

I notice people have been prefacing a lot of posts with 'didn't know if this was OK.....'. Please ASK! We are more than happy to help, and more often than not one of us is floating around in the online ether.

[Image: colleagues.png]
Many thanks to Tyger for a terrific signature
Find all posts by this user
03-03-2010, 04:33 PM
Post: #33
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
Thanks, JHyde, that's what I was trying to say. I'm sorry, I should have explained it more plainly.

"Our doubts are traitors, and make us lose the good we oft might win, by fearing to attempt"
Pactum serva
Find all posts by this user
03-03-2010, 04:57 PM
Post: #34
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
I am going to repeat this: please, no tweets that may or may not be serious. Foxhills is a VENUE, its twitter identity is part of its brand. Had they been lying people would know soon enough.

Doing a random 'spooks filming' search on twitter does NOT qualify as an entry to this thread, no matter how believable it may seem. Same goes for facebook.

Pictures or no post.

[Image: colleagues.png]
Many thanks to Tyger for a terrific signature
Find all posts by this user
03-03-2010, 05:54 PM
Post: #35
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
(03-03-2010 04:57 PM)JHyde Wrote:  I am going to repeat this: please, no tweets that may or may not be serious. Foxhills is a VENUE, its twitter identity is part of its brand. Had they been lying people would know soon enough.

Doing a random 'spooks filming' search on twitter does NOT qualify as an entry to this thread, no matter how believable it may seem. Same goes for facebook.

Pictures or no post.

I´m sorry; I seem to brought up this discussion! I´m feeling a little uncomfortable. I´m new here and I wont "play" against the rules. Twitter is very new for me and it`s seemed to be a good source, but I wont post it again, if there are no pictures or other proofs.
Find all posts by this user
04-03-2010, 11:14 AM
Post: #36
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
Just to clear everything up:

Please do not post tweets or facebook updates which don't have photographic evidence. For people who don't know, people on Twitter will post anything to get followers, even bogus info about Spooks filming. If there's no photo proof, don't believe it.

Our official spoiler policy states that if you are in the Series 9 section, you fully accept that inevitably you will come across spoilers. We cannot protect you from spoilers in the Series 9 section, it is up to you to decide whether or not you're open to knowing spoilers. However, it does no harm to put things in spoiler tags if you're not sure. If you don't know or aren't sure, just put it in spoiler tags.

Also, please no spoilers in thread titles because they can be seen by everyone, even those who are not in the Series 9 section.

If you have any questions about the spoiler policy, or anything else for that matter. PM me. It's what I'm here for. Smile

Sig & Av Guidelines | Rules | Spoiler Policy
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
05-03-2010, 08:43 PM
Post: #37
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
So no pics from Foxhill? Thud
Find all posts by this user
05-03-2010, 08:45 PM
Post: #38
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
It appears not. I checked their facebook page today and found nothing.

I think someone stepped in and presented some legal papers to them forbidding it. It was a closed set after all.

Sig & Av Guidelines | Rules | Spoiler Policy
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
06-03-2010, 01:44 PM (This post was last modified: 06-03-2010 01:47 PM by molecatcher.)
Post: #39
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
(03-03-2010 01:01 PM)Tea Lady Wrote:  
(03-03-2010 10:48 AM)molecatcher Wrote:  
(02-03-2010 11:40 PM)Tea Lady Wrote:  That Foxhill place looks a lovely hotel for a couple to get away for the weekend or wedding venue location....Silba

That's given me the biggest giggle of the day. Ever the optimist eh!!

LOL. I hope I end up being more of a realist on this occassion. Smile Maybe someone at Kudos has taken JHyde's fanfic idea and Foxhill will be where Ruth will be doing her presentation....Mmmm.

I'm hoping Ros and the HS are recouperating in luxury then when they have a weekend visit from H&R we're both realists. Smile
Find all posts by this user
06-03-2010, 02:00 PM
Post: #40
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
Or it's a wedding reception?
*prays*

[Image: 705-roslucas-sig.jpg]
Av & sig by TygerBright, using my screencaps Smile
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)