[spoilers] Harry and Ruth: Back With A Vengeance?

[Agent Acme]

(18-10-2011 05:42 PM)Naivety Wrote:  

(18-10-2011 12:48 PM)beatrice4ruth Wrote:  Frankly, I do not know why I am still speculating after reading the TV guide comments of PF. It is so disheartening and so contrary to what you are so beautifully writing about them: In a sense, what we saw in this episode, is the two of them coming to grips with each other's faults and mistakes, and realising it doesn't change how they feel about each other.

I just don't get it. I can only hope that PF was teasing us.

After reading the Radio Times review, I am even ready to believe that

Series 10 Spoiler: show

Ruth is a traitor and she is going to kill Harry. It's so pathetic or should I say I am so pathetic for getting so involved in Spooks. Let's hope that I can laugh at the jokes.

1. Ruth is not a traitor. She is just as patriotic as Harry is, and will not betray Britain.

2. I think Peter is being a naughty boy and keeping us speculating. It's the writers (and Kudos) who decide whether Harry and Ruth get together.

Spoiler: show

I am trying to keep the faith and follow Ian Wylie's blog. He is a genuine Spooks fan, and an H/R shipper. If he is happy with episode 6 then I think I will be.

I really hate to disagree with you there. I'd love for things to work out for Harry and Ruth, but Ian Wylie's blog doesn't really fill me with much confidence, a great ending, yes but for H/R shippers?

Ian's a bloke ( sorry boys, generalising a bit here, no offence!) Men tend to have a more pragmatic approach to romance, and fictional romance, well, I don't think you'll catch many men reading Barbara Cartland or Mills and Boon, and 'chick flics', you have to drag em' to the cinema....or so they would have you believe!

I still live in hope, and everything is crossed, but......