Thread Rating:
  • 2 Votes - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Episode 5 Discussion
30-11-2009, 12:54 PM
Post: #61
RE: Episode 5 Discussion
In comparing Coleville to Othello, I merely meant to imply that he was a good man gone bad due to love, although he probably had more reason to be pissed off than Othello. I liked that Boxer could play both the strengths and weaknesses of one of the more interesting villains that show has had.

And no, I know what "I have a headache means". And so does Sarah, although for her it may have been a little more serious.

[Image: colleagues.png]
Many thanks to Tyger for a terrific signature
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
30-11-2009, 05:39 PM
Post: #62
RE: Episode 5 Discussion
Reading through this I am so tempted to go watch it lol but I have vowed to make myself wait til Wed Angel I find it is not the same as on a big TV screen Big Grin
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
30-11-2009, 05:40 PM
Post: #63
RE: Episode 5 Discussion
Why are you on this thread then? But well done for having the self-control - mine failed spectacularly after the first episode Tongue

DANNY - Placements all over the shop. Back up vehicles, chopper support if we need it. Bomb disposal with a signal jammer for Mary’s trademark remote control blasts. And Tom here’s doing the catering. Mate. You are so covered.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
30-11-2009, 05:46 PM
Post: #64
RE: Episode 5 Discussion
Haha I couldn't resist having a peek at the storyline and to see what the reviews were like Blush
I shall now leave this thread and never to return until I have actually have something relevant to contribute Smile
Sorry lol
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
30-11-2009, 05:47 PM
Post: #65
RE: Episode 5 Discussion
You're in for a good episode - make sure there's space behind the sofa for you to crawl behind Tongue

DANNY - Placements all over the shop. Back up vehicles, chopper support if we need it. Bomb disposal with a signal jammer for Mary’s trademark remote control blasts. And Tom here’s doing the catering. Mate. You are so covered.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
30-11-2009, 06:52 PM
Post: #66
RE: Episode 5 Discussion
(30-11-2009 05:39 PM)YourFutureMuse Wrote:  Reading through this I am so tempted to go watch it lol but I have vowed to make myself wait til Wed Angel I find it is not the same as on a big TV screen Big Grin

Sorry to tempt you but I have to say that the youtube version of the ep is really high quality actually Tongue
Haha that's actually quite evil of me Tongue I hope you ignore me and stick to your resolve Big Grin

ros
Death by mascara. It was horrible to watch. Ruth's agonizing over the fact that there are no more horses in modern-day warfare and Adam's on a course learning how to lift his knuckles off the ground. So, you'll have to make do with me, I'm afraid.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-12-2009, 04:24 AM
Post: #67
RE: Episode 5 Discussion
Why didn't Lucas question why Christine 2.0 was at the TV studio when Maynard was shot? I mean, he did tell her that they were worried that Coleville was after Maynard but neither he nor the rest of the team ever asked why she was there?

harry
"What is the truth?"
"Betrayal is a cancer. Let it eat your soul, not mine."
"Please tell me this isn't going where I think it's going."
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-12-2009, 06:37 AM
Post: #68
RE: Episode 5 Discussion
Yeah! That confused me too!!!

DANNY - Placements all over the shop. Back up vehicles, chopper support if we need it. Bomb disposal with a signal jammer for Mary’s trademark remote control blasts. And Tom here’s doing the catering. Mate. You are so covered.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-12-2009, 07:54 AM
Post: #69
RE: Episode 5 Discussion
Because by doing so he would have tipped her off that they were at least curious about her actions, if not downright suspicious. This way they have a chance at following her, tapping her phone et cetera....and actually cracking Nightingale. Not that they know exactly what it is yet, and neither do we, of course!

[Image: colleagues.png]
Many thanks to Tyger for a terrific signature
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-12-2009, 02:26 PM (This post was last modified: 01-12-2009 02:28 PM by lwhite53.)
Post: #70
RE: Episode 5 Discussion
(01-12-2009 07:54 AM)JHyde Wrote:  Because by doing so he would have tipped her off that they were at least curious about her actions, if not downright suspicious. This way they have a chance at following her, tapping her phone et cetera....and actually cracking Nightingale. Not that they know exactly what it is yet, and neither do we, of course!

At that point in the ep, though, they weren't suspicious of her yet. Had it been me, the fact that she was at the TV studio at all would have made me VERY suspicious right then. How did she even know where Maynard would be? We (the audience) know she's getting help from some unidentified voice on the phone. The MI5 crew don't know that yet.

harry
"What is the truth?"
"Betrayal is a cancer. Let it eat your soul, not mine."
"Please tell me this isn't going where I think it's going."
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: