SpooksWatch 2010
|
28-04-2010, 09:17 PM
Post: #281
|
|||
|
|||
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
Yay! More (tiny) details Loving it and barely keeping from getting too excited! Autumn is too far away!
|
|||
28-04-2010, 09:23 PM
Post: #282
|
|||
|
|||
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
Great article, thanks! "Big surprises in store" for Lucas...? Can't wait.
And I'd love to run my fingers through his hair too... |
|||
29-04-2010, 01:18 AM
(This post was last modified: 29-04-2010 08:08 PM by JHyde.)
Post: #283
|
|||
|
|||
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
Holy crap, this is exciting. I am especially glad to hear that Lucas and Harry and Ruth have lots of exciting stuff planned.
For everybody wondering what the link between counter terrorism and piracy is, do you not read? Almost every article I have read on home grown terrorism in the last 8 years have involved the two terms. Mostly because piracy is a common source of revenue for terrorist cells. The same goes for rip off designer goods. It's why you shouldn't buy them. And I am really pissed because that was the underlying theme of my next fan fic. This is the best thing for Sophia Myles' career since she did Doctor Who. I love her one mandate that won't run in high heels - good for her! Many thanks to Tyger for a terrific signature |
|||
29-04-2010, 01:24 PM
Post: #284
|
|||
|
|||
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
Thanks a lot Lucas North#1 (and livinglovingmad) for the link !
Lucas 8.4: It's all about trust, isn't Harry ?. Signature by the brilliant TygerBright |
|||
29-04-2010, 05:45 PM
Post: #285
|
|||
|
|||
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
Thanks for the link. I love how this article manages to say absolutely nothing at all about Series 9. It does however make me nervous about the character of Lucas. I hope the don't make him a traitor or give us "sarah"
|
|||
30-04-2010, 09:55 PM
Post: #286
|
|||
|
|||
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
The fact that they have interviewed
Series 9 Spoiler: show Maybe I'm the only one who still has hope LNF |
|||
30-04-2010, 10:25 PM
Post: #287
|
|||
|
|||
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
(30-04-2010 09:55 PM)LucasNorthFan Wrote: The fact that they have interviewed No, I have hope LNF. It could be that they are not allowed to release that information. They must all sign some sort of agreement with the press office. I still have hope because of the Foxhills photos but it is only a hope that lasts until the end of episode 9.1. |
|||
30-04-2010, 10:34 PM
Post: #288
|
|||
|
|||
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
Yeah, I don't think anyone has actually come out saying they don't want Ros to come back.
I really hope she does too. To be honest, I'm pretty sure that with the exception of Peter last season, they usually don't have the people involved in cliffhangers do the press. Think Jo at the beginning of season 7. Many thanks to Tyger for a terrific signature |
|||
01-05-2010, 05:11 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-05-2010 08:13 AM by JHyde.)
Post: #289
|
|||
|
|||
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
Spoiler: show |
|||
01-05-2010, 08:17 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-05-2010 08:18 AM by JHyde.)
Post: #290
|
|||
|
|||
RE: SpooksWatch 2010
Yeah but that was refuted by Kudos in another article the same week. (Admittedly that article is from the first week of broadcast.) There was never any official confirmation she was gone.
The biggest gaff was Hermione on the morning show, but it wasn't as bad as Miranda Raison, who basically came out and said she *was* leaving. It will be a first for the show if she's confirmed dead in the first episode. Essentially the cliffhanger is Ros and the HS. With Danny, we knew he was dead. This one, we don't actually *know*. But yeah, I reckon she's dead. That article reads like one of those insider articles on a couple's marriage. Plus, it's the Daily Mail for crying out loud! Many thanks to Tyger for a terrific signature |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 42 Guest(s)