[Spoilers] Sir Harry Pearce
|
23-09-2009, 06:44 PM
Post: #21
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Sir Harry Pearce
(23-09-2009 04:15 PM)Tea Lady Wrote:(20-09-2009 10:15 AM)almh Wrote: Yep. Knighted in series 6 series 6 episode 3. He previously had a CBE, but that doesn't carry a title. He then got an OBE or MBE, so 'Sir'. Well she offered! And it would have been quite rude if he said no. Also I think he didn't feel comfortable about getting knighted, so wanted someone he knew there. Catherine was probably filming somewhere, and Ruth's... somewhere as well, so I suppose Connie isn't that odd a choice for him to bring along. I agree with the vulnerability. Awww, poor Harry asking Ruth out! And speaking to Catherine - those are the only two times that we've seen him cry, I think, although I may be wrong. DANNY - Placements all over the shop. Back up vehicles, chopper support if we need it. Bomb disposal with a signal jammer for Mary’s trademark remote control blasts. And Tom here’s doing the catering. Mate. You are so covered. |
|||
23-09-2009, 07:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 23-09-2009 07:08 PM by Beatriz.)
Post: #22
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Sir Harry Pearce
I agree with most of you, I think he has sth, not handsome but some atractiveness...
Yesterday I began watching spooks again (series 1 episode 1) and he had short hair, I prefer him with the hair not so short, ![]() He is determined but on the other hand, when it comes to feelings he's very vulnerable... It was so cute to watch him being a father or with Ruth, he was another person ![]() |
|||
23-09-2009, 07:13 PM
Post: #23
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Sir Harry Pearce
Short hair is a no. I'm sorry, but it really does not look good on him.
DANNY - Placements all over the shop. Back up vehicles, chopper support if we need it. Bomb disposal with a signal jammer for Mary’s trademark remote control blasts. And Tom here’s doing the catering. Mate. You are so covered. |
|||
23-09-2009, 07:28 PM
Post: #24
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Sir Harry Pearce
Yeah I agree, it was too short in season 1. I quite liked the way it looked in season 2:
Any excuse to look at Harry in his tux ![]() ![]() |
|||
23-09-2009, 07:30 PM
Post: #25
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Sir Harry Pearce
Definitely a good look
![]() DANNY - Placements all over the shop. Back up vehicles, chopper support if we need it. Bomb disposal with a signal jammer for Mary’s trademark remote control blasts. And Tom here’s doing the catering. Mate. You are so covered. |
|||
23-09-2009, 07:31 PM
Post: #26
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Sir Harry Pearce
hahaha that's it!!!
![]() |
|||
23-09-2009, 11:33 PM
Post: #27
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Sir Harry Pearce
I dont know if it is me going mad but I am watching "Watch" channel and the Spooks repeats on Wednesday nights. Last nights episodes were cut to bits. In fact as far as I can remember, the main cuts were Harry and Ruth. I guess because that story line can be cut and doesnt really alter the main plot. Is this how the episodes are sold to other countries who also have adverts? I can only assume the episodes have been cut to fit in the three sets of adverts. The bits where
Spoiler: show ![]() |
|||
24-09-2009, 01:10 AM
Post: #28
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Sir Harry Pearce
I hate it when episodes are cut up so crudely for ad-time... and not just with Spooks.. ALL BBC shows suffer the same fate when broadcast on other channels!!
Sig & Av Guidelines | Rules | Spoiler Policy |
|||
24-09-2009, 02:13 AM
Post: #29
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Sir Harry Pearce
They were hacked to bits both on A&E and on BBC America in the US.
Always love your country, but never trust your government. |
|||
24-09-2009, 11:29 AM
Post: #30
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Sir Harry Pearce
But at least they are made a full hour to fit with the BBC schedules. Some programmes are clearly made only 50 minutes long so the American channels can put in their adverts and we get a 10 minute document of behind the scenes filming. We wouldn't want Spooks reduce to 50 minutes, would we !!
|
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)