Poll: Is Harry the best character on Spooks?
This poll is closed.
Hell yes, he's the lynchpin of the show. But Ruth's pretty awesome too. 80.70% 46 80.70%
God no. I barrack for that man who came back from Russia and got it on with Miss C.I.A. Lucas something? 19.30% 11 19.30%
Total 57 votes 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

 
Thread Rating:
  • 5 Votes - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[spoilers] Sir Harry Pearce 2.0
04-04-2010, 09:00 AM
Post: #111
RE: [spoilers] Sir Harry Pearce 2.0
I agree with your comments about Harry being one of the best things about spooks, though I don't agree with your comments about Ruth, but each to their own. IMO Harry is too important a character for Kudos to kill off, though I can't see him retiring and setting up a private agency as he is too much of a public servant.

harry
We move on from this
It's the realisation that I make a negligible difference
Sometimes you have to give a man a chance
Find all posts by this user
04-04-2010, 09:16 AM
Post: #112
RE: [spoilers] Sir Harry Pearce 2.0
Ah, but what do retired public servants do? They become consultants to the people they used to work for...but at a much higher rate of pay!! They're also not bound by the same rules...so a lot of potential for Harry to bend them even more than he does now...

I just watched 6.2 again. Love Harry in that navy shirt with his sleeves rolled up!

"Where's Harry?"
"Moving in mysterious ways."
Find all posts by this user
04-04-2010, 10:33 AM
Post: #113
RE: [spoilers] Sir Harry Pearce 2.0
Oh dear, keep your head down picard1109 when Beatriz reads that "annoying wimp" comment about Ruthy babes. Smile Anyway, back to Harry I dont think he will be killed off unless of course the actor wants to leave the series. It makes no sense for Kudos to kill off Harry otherwise. The series will die as has been said before by many people here. Harry still has a major part to play in storylines with both younger and older characters. He can fight the good fight, fair or dirty. The viewers are not yet bored of that. I do believe that we have at least two more series of Spooks to come, evidenced by the high number and quality of actors recently employed, and I believe that Harry will be in Spooks right up to the end. It makes no sense for him not to be. There are still storylines a plenty that could involve Harry.

[Image: Banner106smaller.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
04-04-2010, 11:38 AM (This post was last modified: 04-04-2010 11:44 AM by Beatriz.)
Post: #114
RE: [spoilers] Sir Harry Pearce 2.0
I'm ok, just breathing, it's good to have different opinions here, it will be boring if not Smile You can tell us your opinions about Ruth in her thread or in the Harry and Ruth one; different points of view are good Smile

BTW, welcome to the forum picard1109, you can introduce yourself in the New Personnel subforum, if you like Smile

I agree with Tea Lady, I can't see Harry out of the show unless PF wants to leave (I hope not!!!); he still has a great role to play with many different characters in the show. And I can't see him retiring to set up his own bussiness... Maybe he could retire to a cottage, after Spooks finishes of course Wink

"Our doubts are traitors, and make us lose the good we oft might win, by fearing to attempt"
Pactum serva
Find all posts by this user
04-04-2010, 12:04 PM
Post: #115
RE: [spoilers] Sir Harry Pearce 2.0
Agreed, I don't think Harry would leave the grid unless Peter Firth wanted to move on. PF has said how much Harry is similar to his temperament, so obviously he is making the most of playing the role of the life time for as long as he can. The constant flood of new characters means that Harry always has new personnel to establish (or reestablish) relationships with, which I imagine would continue to make playing Harry an interesting challenge when there's always something new to explore.

Fantragic fun - SpooksFanBlog.com
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
04-04-2010, 04:23 PM
Post: #116
RE: [spoilers] Sir Harry Pearce 2.0
Yeah, I agree that they're unlikely to kill off Harry unless PF wants to leave. From what he's said in interviews he loves playing Harry so is likely to stick around. Furthermore, we know from DVD extras that he loves working with Nicola Walker, so he is unlikely to walk away just when she is back.

What did you all think of Harry in 3.2? I thought it illustrated perfectly that Harry's biggest strength - his ability to divorce the emotional from the spying work - is sometimes also his biggest weakness. The fact that Harry himself believes that safeguarding the country is worth any personal cost, sometimes blinds him to the fact that other people look at it differently. In this episode he did it first with Fred, where it seemed incomprehensible to him that someone would not want to serve their country, and then with Tom, where he didn't seem to notice how much Tom was struggling to live with the emotional cost of the job.

[Image: cheersignew.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
04-04-2010, 05:41 PM
Post: #117
RE: [spoilers] Sir Harry Pearce 2.0
Harry in 3.2 is not the Harry you get now. I couldnt see Harry acting so flippantly today regarding an asset where you were putting him and his family in harms way. I wonder with regards to Tom, whether Harry had already made his mind up that he was a lost cause and that there was nothing Harry could do to make him turn back on the road he had started, hence bringing Adam in. I did notice though in the scene where Harry is with Zoe in his office, after Harry says "go live your life" and she says thanks, the camera stays on Harry and it sounds like he makes a little sighing noise, unless it was my tinnitus playing up again.

[Image: Banner106smaller.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
04-04-2010, 08:13 PM
Post: #118
RE: [spoilers] Sir Harry Pearce 2.0
Oops - didn't mean to touch a raw nerve, Beatriz...apologies.Undecided

And I'm very glad that opinion seems to be that Harry won't be exiting stage left!

"Where's Harry?"
"Moving in mysterious ways."
Find all posts by this user
04-04-2010, 09:22 PM
Post: #119
RE: [spoilers] Sir Harry Pearce 2.0
Don't worry picard1109! I was just kidding, you can express your opinion here (I'm a big fan of Ruth, it's just that Wink)

I think Harry knew Tom wasn't at his best, and was unstable emotionally. According to Harry's diary this op is two months and a half after Tom's set-up was solved, I'm not sure he was ready to lead an op. However Harry put him in charge...

I didn't notice that sigh, I will watch that part again to hear it Smile

"Our doubts are traitors, and make us lose the good we oft might win, by fearing to attempt"
Pactum serva
Find all posts by this user
04-04-2010, 10:47 PM
Post: #120
RE: [spoilers] Sir Harry Pearce 2.0
TL and Silktie -- I think Harry realized that Tom wasn't going to be able to go on being a spook because, as Ruth alluded, his "conscience exploded." Tom was no good to MI5 in that condition and the best thing Harry could have done for him was to decommission him, "Good luck in the real world." I think maybe Harry really did envy Tom -- Tom got out alive and in one piece, generally speaking.

harry
"What is the truth?"
"Betrayal is a cancer. Let it eat your soul, not mine."
"Please tell me this isn't going where I think it's going."
Find all posts by this user


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)